Monday, April 17, 2017

Blog 3

            Virtue directly translates to the “essence of man” which means that the word ‘man’ and the word ‘virtue’ can essentially be used interchangeably. Machiavelli and Michelangelo both painted and wrote about what it means to be a man, but in completely different ways with different beliefs about what it means to be a man. Machiavelli uses the example of what a prince should be like to describe what man is whereas Michelangelo reaches out to God’s likeness to describe what a man should be.
            Machiavelli’s text, The Prince, compares what the people are like to what the leader should be like. For example, on page 42 the text states, “Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires.” Therefore, a man who wants to be ‘The Prince’ or have authority and power over others must be what the people are. By comparing this to politics today, leaders like Mitt Romney will not be voted into office, but leaders like Donald Trump will be voted into office because the majority of the population thinks along the same lines as Donald Trump. Machiavelli thinks that man should be powerful and what the people want. Another example from The Prince is found on page 115 and says, “the means of attaining glory are different in a republic that is corrupt from what they are in a republic that still preserves its institutions pure.” This explains the difference that man can and has the ability to be. For example, nations that are one thing will follow a man who is the same. But the nation who values other things will value the leader who values those same things.
            Michelangelo on the other hand describes man in a completely different way. He pulls from God’s likeness to describe what man should be. His sculpture David was described as “a symbol of the Ideal Renaissance man- a speaker of words, and a doer of deeds, a king, a shepherd, a poet, and a lover.” These things that David symbolizes are traits that God also symbolizes. Michelangelo showed through his sculpture of David the beauty, strength, and goodness that man can be by being like God. He shows that virtue comes from God. Michelangelo’s painting the Creation of Adam also shows the similarities but differences from man to God. It is said that “Michelangelo strove in every way to restore to Adam's presence his corporeity, the features of ancient beauty. With great daring he even transferred this visible and corporal beauty to the Creator himself. We are probably witnesses to an extraordinary piece of artistic audacity, since it is impossible to impose the likeness proper to man on the invisible God.” Michelangelo truly loved the beauty that man could have when based off of God’s beauty. He showed this through his artwork that man is truly from the likeness of God.

            Overall, there is a lot to what man is or is not. Some of what man is is based off of what authority men want or what men can have. Man is also based off of what God shows what men could be. Machiavelli’s view is very different from Michelangelo’s but both show how what man is based off of another power whether God or man. Both artists show how man is strong and powerful and great. The essence of virtue lies in man itself.